CWE-927: Use of Implicit Intent for Sensitive Communication
The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications.
Last updated
Overview
Since an implicit intent does not specify a particular application to receive the data, any application can process the intent by using an Intent Filter for that intent. This can allow untrusted applications to obtain sensitive data. There are two variations on the standard broadcast intent, ordered and sticky. Ordered broadcast intents are delivered to a series of registered receivers in order of priority as declared by the Receivers. A malicious receiver can give itself a high priority and cause a denial of service by stopping the broadcast from propagating further down the chain. There is also the possibility of malicious data modification, as a receiver may also alter the data within the Intent before passing it on to the next receiver. The downstream components have no way of asserting that the data has not been altered earlier in the chain. Sticky broadcast intents remain accessible after the initial broadcast. An old sticky intent will be broadcast again to any new receivers that register for it in the future, greatly increasing the chances of information exposure over time. Also, sticky broadcasts cannot be protected by permissions that may apply to other kinds of intents. In addition, any broadcast intent may include a URI that references data that the receiving component does not normally have the privileges to access. The sender of the intent can include special privileges that grant the receiver read or write access to the specific URI included in the intent. A malicious receiver that intercepts this intent will also gain those privileges and be able to read or write the resource at the specified URI.
Real-world CVEs
18 recorded CVEs are caused by CWE-927 (Use of Implicit Intent for Sensitive Communication). The highest-severity and most recent are shown first. 0 new CWE-927 CVEs have been recorded so far in 2026 (1 in 2025).
- CVE-2022-4903High · CVSS 8.1 · EPSS 47th2023-02-10
- CVE-2025-48558High · CVSS 7.8 · EPSS 0th2025-09-04
- CVE-2023-47889High · CVSS 7.8 · EPSS 19th2024-02-06
- CVE-2023-44122High · CVSS 7.8 · EPSS 1th2023-09-27
- CVE-2022-36830Medium · CVSS 6.2 · EPSS 7th2022-08-05
- CVE-2022-36829Medium · CVSS 6.2 · EPSS 7th2022-08-05
- CVE-2022-33734Medium · CVSS 6.2 · EPSS 8th2022-08-05
- CVE-2022-33733Medium · CVSS 6.2 · EPSS 7th2022-08-05
- CVE-2023-44124Medium · CVSS 6.1 · EPSS 1th2023-09-27
- CVE-2024-3108Medium · CVSS 5.5 · EPSS 5th2024-05-03
- CVE-2023-44127Medium · CVSS 5.5 · EPSS 2th2023-09-27
- CVE-2023-41826Medium · CVSS 5.1 · EPSS 5th2024-05-03
Showing 12 of 18 recorded CWE-927 CVEs. Track new ones as they are published and get AI-written analysis and fixes.
Monitor CWE-927 vulnerabilitiesCommon consequences
What can happen when CWE-927 is exploited.
Read Application Data
Affects: Confidentiality
Other applications, possibly untrusted, can read the data that is offered through the Intent.
Varies by Context
Affects: Integrity
The application may handle responses from untrusted applications on the device, which could cause it to perform unexpected or unauthorized actions.
How it happens
When it is introduced
Typically introduced during these phases of the software lifecycle.
Applies to
Technologies
How to prevent it
Practical mitigations for CWE-927, grouped by where in the lifecycle they apply.
If the application only requires communication with its own components, then the destination is always known, and an explicit intent could be used.
How to detect it
Automated Static Analysis
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Effectiveness: High
Code examples
Illustrative examples from MITRE showing how the weakness appears in code.
This application wants to create a user account in several trusted applications using one broadcast intent:
Vulnerable example
Intent intent = new Intent();Attack input
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter("com.example.CreateUser");This application interfaces with a web service that requires a separate user login. It creates a sticky intent, so that future trusted applications that also use the web service will know who the current user is:
Vulnerable example
Intent intent = new Intent();Attack input
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter("com.example.service.UserExists");Sticky broadcasts can be read by any application at any time, and so should never contain sensitive information such as a username.
This application is sending an ordered broadcast, asking other applications to open a URL:
Vulnerable example
Intent intent = new Intent();Attack input
public class CallReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {This application sends a special intent with a flag that allows the receiving application to read a data file for backup purposes.
Vulnerable example
Intent intent = new Intent();Attack input
public class CallReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {Any malicious application can register to receive this intent. Because of the FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION included with the intent, the malicious receiver code can read the user's data.
Illustrative examples
Real CVEs that MITRE cites as examples of this weakness.
- CVE-2022-4903 — An Android application does not use FLAG_IMMUTABLE when creating a PendingIntent.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about CWE-927.
- What is CWE-927?
- The Android application uses an implicit intent for transmitting sensitive data to other applications.
- What CVEs are caused by CWE-927?
- 18 recorded CVEs are attributed to CWE-927, including CVE-2022-4903, CVE-2025-48558, CVE-2023-47889.
- How do you prevent CWE-927?
- If the application only requires communication with its own components, then the destination is always known, and an explicit intent could be used.
- How is CWE-927 detected?
- Automated Static Analysis: Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
- What are the consequences of CWE-927?
- Exploiting CWE-927 can lead to: Read Application Data, Varies by Context.
- Is CWE-927 actively exploited?
- 18 recorded CVEs are caused by CWE-927; none are currently in CISA's KEV catalog of actively exploited flaws.
References
- MITRE CWE definition (CWE-927) (opens in a new tab)
- CWE-927 vulnerabilities on NVD (opens in a new tab)
- Learn: What is a CWE?
Weakness data is sourced from the MITRE CWE catalog (v4.20). CVE associations are aggregated and kept current by RadicalNotion.AI.
Stay ahead of CWE-927
Get alerted the moment a new CWE-927 vulnerability affects your stack, with AI-written analysis, severity context, and remediation guidance.